|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id288805. ; Size: 39K
|
|
Ethics in ADR: The Many "Cs" of Professional Responsibility and Dispute Resolution
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Georgetown University Law Center; University of California Irvine, School of Law
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 288804
Abstract:
This essay, based on a talk given at AALS Annual Meeting of Professional Responsibility and Dispute Resolution Sections in 2001 reviews current developments in the ethics of the practice of Alternative (or "appropriate" ) Dispute Resolution. The essay reviews current issues of counseling about ADR, choice of law, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, choice and coercion in the use of mediation and other forms of ADR and in particular, lawyers' roles in this area of practice. The article refers to current developments in the ABA Ethics 2000 Commission's proposals for changes to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and other new efforts at drafting ethics and standards in ADR, including the new CPR-Georgetown Commission on Ethics and Standards in ADR's report on Provider Principles.
Note: This is a description of the paper and not the actual abstract.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: November 4, 2001
Suggested CitationMenkel-Meadow, Carrie J., Ethics in ADR: The Many "Cs" of Professional Responsibility and Dispute Resolution. Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 28, April 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=288805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.288805
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
