|
||||
|
||||
An Empirical Investigation of Coalitional Bargaining Procedures
Daniel Diermeier Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management Antonio Merlo University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics October 2001 PIER Working Paper No. 01-042 Abstract: Models of government formation processes in multi party democracies are usually highly sensitive to the rules that govern the selection of formateurs (i.e., the parties selected to propose a potential government). The theoretical literature has focused on two selection rules: selection proportional to seat share, and selection in order of seat share. In this paper we use a new data set on government formations in 11 parliamentary democracies to empirically assess which selection rule most closely approximates the data. We find that while there is little empirical support for selection in order of seat share, proportional selection fits the data well.
Keywords: Government Formation, Proposer Selection, Bargaining Procedures JEL Classifications: D72, H19 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: November 27, 2001 ; Last revised: November 29, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.141 seconds.