|
||||
|
||||
Consideration, Characterisation, Evaluation: Transactions at an Undervalue after 'Phillips v Brewin Dolphin'Riz MokalWorld Bank Global Initiative on insolvency and Creditor/Debtor Regimes; University College London (UCL) - Faculty of Laws; Chambers of Michael Crystal QC Look Chan HoFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP; The World Bank Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 2001, No. 2, December 2001 Abstract: This paper takes the opportunity, presented by the House of Lords' decision in Phillips v Brewin Dolphin, to examine the law governing the reversal of transactions at an undervalue entered into by a company which then becomes insolvent. The paper discusses the sequence in which issues related to ascertaining whether a transaction had been at an undervalue are to be approached, the proposition that contracts somehow "linked" with each other can be taken together as constituting a single "transaction", and the prior question about when such contracts should be considered "linked" in the first place. Finally, the paper detects something of a tendency in the case law to use the notion of a transaction at an undervalue to brush aside inconveniences arising from the peculiarities in the way certain cases have been pleaded. Notably, it suggests that Phillips v Brewin Dolphin might not have involved any transaction at an undervalue at basall.
Keywords: bankruptcy; undervalue transactions JEL Classification: G33, K22, K42 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 15, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds