|
||||
|
||||
Do Investors in Controlled Firms Value Insider Trading Laws? International EvidenceLaura Nyantung BenyUniversity of Michigan Law School Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2, 267, 2008 U of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 06-003 William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 837 Abstract: This article characterizes insider trading in controlled firms as an agency problem. Using a standard agency model of corporate value diversion through insider trading by a controlling shareholder, I derive testable hypotheses about the relationship between corporate value and insider trading laws. The article tests these hypotheses using cross-sectional data on firms from a group of developed countries. The results show that stringent insider trading laws and enforcement are associated with greater corporate valuation among firms in common law countries, a result that is consistent with the claim that insider trading laws can mitigate agency costs. In contrast, insider trading laws and enforcement are generally insignificant to corporate valuation among firms in civil law countries. These results are robust to alternative regression specifications and to controlling for a variety of relevant factors and they suggest that the firm-level impact of insider trading regulation may depend on the local context in which it is applied.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45 Keywords: corporate valuation, insider trading, insider trading laws and enforcement, agency costs, private benefits, law and finance JEL Classification: G30, G38, K22 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 7, 2003 ; Last revised: June 15, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.687 seconds