Human Cloning: The Role of Law
Susan R. Martyn
University of Toledo - College of Law
University of Toledo Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, Spring 2001
Law embodies the moral judgments of a society. In the past, law has been used to encourage, leave alone, regulate, or ban new or emerging scientific potential. The novel legal issues that will be raised should human cloning become a reality lead to several tentative conclusions. First, we should not encourage human cloning. Second, laissez faire attitudes are too dangerous to tolerate. Third, extensive regulation will be necessary to protect both clone-donors and cloned individuals. Fourth, cloning should be undertaken only by not-for-profit organizations. Overall, we should put the burden on those who wish to use human cloning to demonstrate both benefits and safety. Even then, concerns about who will benefit and at what cost to others should inform our public policy. In considering our legal response to cloning, we need to be vigilant about the risk of human fallibility and misplaced self-confidence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: Human Cloning, Legal Regulation, Law, Moral Judgments, Government Funding, Patent Protection, Laissez Faire, Human Subjects Research, Tuskegee Experiment, Family Law, Privacy, Commodification, Posner, Nonprofit
JEL Classification: K32, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 15, 2002 ; Last revised: May 11, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds