|
||||
|
||||
The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Management
Richard M. Frankel Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business Marilyn F. Johnson Michigan State University - Department of Accounting & Information Systems Karen K. Nelson Rice University - Jones Graduate School of Business July 2002 MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4330-02 Abstract: This paper examines whether auditor fees are associated with earnings management and the market reaction to the disclosure of auditor fees. Using data collected from proxy statements, we present evidence that non-audit fees are positively associated with small positive earnings surprises, the magnitude of absolute discretionary accruals, and the magnitude of income-increasing and income-decreasing discretionary accruals. In contrast, audit fees are negatively associated with these earnings management indicators. These results are robust to a variety of alternative variable definitions and model specifications. Specifically, contrary to the claims of Ashbaugh et al. (2002), the results are robust to the use of performance-matched discretionary accruals. Moreover, contrary to the claims of Francis and Ke (2002), the results for small positive earnings surprises are robust regardless of whether the comparison group is all other earnings surprises or small negative earnings surprises. Our final set of results provide evidence of a significant negative association between non-audit fees and share values on the date the fees were disclosed, although the effect is small in economic terms.
Keywords: auditor independence, auditor fees, earnings management, discretionary accruals JEL Classifications: G12, M41, M43, M49, L84 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: January 20, 2002 ; Last revised: May 06, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.