Signs of the Times: Dale V. Boy Scouts of America and the Changing Meaning of Nondiscrimination
Northwestern University School of Law
Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 23, 2002
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 02-02
All antidiscrimination laws are unconstitutional in all their applications. Citizens are allowed to disobey laws whenever obedience would be perceived as endorsing some message. Both of these propositions are absurd. However, the Supreme Court's opinion in Dale v. Boy Scouts of America stands for at least one of them, and perhaps both. The already voluminous commentary on Dale is too polite, because almost all of it fails to notice the sheer lunacy of what the Court said. The Court's disastrous opinion offers a useful cautionary lesson in First Amendment jurisprudence: determinations of what is protected speech cannot defer either to individual speakers or to the culture as a whole, because such deference produces bizarre results.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 16, 2002 ; Last revised: May 10, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.781 seconds