|
||||
|
||||
Effort and Performance in Public-Policy ContentsGil S. EpsteinBar Ilan University - Department of Economics; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); University College London - CReAM - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration Shmuel NitzanBar Ilan University - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) January 2002 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 634 Abstract: Government intervention often gives rise to contests in which the possible "prizes" are determined by the existing status-quo and some new public-policy proposal . In this paper we study the general class of such two-player public-policy contests and examine the effect of a change in the proposed policy, a change that may affect the payoffs of the two contestants, on their effort and performance. We extend the existing comparative statics studies that focus on the effect of changes either in the value of the prize in symmetric contests or in one of the contestants' valuation of the prize in asymmetric contests. Our results hinge on the relationship between the strategic own-stake "income" effect and the strategic rival's-stake "substitution" effect. This relationship is determined by three types of ability and stakes asymmetry between the contestants. In particular, we specify the asymmetry condition under which a more restrained government intervention that reduces the contestants' prizes has the perverse effect of increasing their aggregate lobbying efforts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25 Keywords: Public-policy Contests, Policy Reforms, Lobbying Efforts, Strategic Own-stake Effect, Strategic Rival's-stake "Substitution" Effect JEL Classification: D72, D6 working papers seriesDate posted: January 30, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds