|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id297747. ; Size: 125K
|
|
Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions
Mark L. DeFond
University of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting
Kannan Raghunandan
Florida International University (FIU) - School of Accounting
K.R. Subramanyam
University of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting
January 2002
USC Leventhal School of Accounting
Abstract:
We find no evidence that non-audit service fees impair auditor independence, where independence is surrogated by auditors' propensity to issue going concern audit opinions. We do find, however, that auditors are more likely to issue going concern opinions to clients paying higher audit fees, suggesting that auditors behave with relatively greater independence towards these clients. Our findings are consistent with Reynolds and Francis (2001) and suggest that market-based incentives, such as loss of reputation and litigation costs, dominate the benefits auditors are likely to receive from compromising their independence to retain clients that pay larger fees. Overall, our findings indicate that recent SEC regulations based on concerns that non-audit services impair auditor independence, are unfounded.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: Non-audit services; Audit fees; Audit markets
JEL Classification: M49
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: January 22, 2002
Suggested CitationDeFond, Mark L., Raghunandan, Kannan and Subramanyam, K.R., Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions (January 2002). USC Leventhal School of Accounting. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=297747 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.297747
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Do Non-Audit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence
By
Hollis Skaife,
Ryan Lafond, ...
2.
Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence, and Internal Control Weaknesses
By
Yan Zhang,
Jian Zhou, ...
3.
The Inevitability of Enron and the Impossibility of 'Auditor Independence' Under the Current Audit System
By
Sean O'connor
4.
Earnings Quality and Auditor Independence: An Examination Using Non-audit Fee Data
By
Carol Dee,
Ayalew Lulseged, ...
5.
The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Management
By
Richard Frankel,
Marilyn Johnson, ...
6.
Going-concern Opinions in Failing Companies: Auditor Dependence and Opinion Shopping
By
Clive Lennox
7.
Non-Audit Services and Earnings Conservatism: Is Auditor Independence Impaired?
By
Caitlin Ruddock,
Sarah Taylor, ...
8.
Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management
By
April Klein
9.
Going Concern Decisions and Auditor Switches: An Economic Perspective
By
Robert Tucker
and
Ella Matsumura
10.
Non-Audit Services and Big 5 Auditor Independence: Evidence from Audit Pricing and Audit Opinion of Initial Engagement
By
Kam Wah Lai
and
Andrew Yim
|
|
|
|
