The Constitutional Validity of Military Commissions
Curtis A. Bradley
Duke University - School of Law
Jack Landman Goldsmith III
Harvard Law School
The Green Bag, Vol. 5, Spring 2002
This essay defends the constitutional validity of the Military Order issued by President Bush on November 13, 2001, which authorizes the establishment of military commissions to try certain non-citizens involved in terrorism. The essay begins by describing the ways in which military commissions have been used throughout U.S. history. It then explains why President Bush had statutory authority to issue the Military Order, and why he probably also had independent constitutional authority to do so as Commander in Chief. Although the Order was not preceded by a congressional declaration of war, the essay argues that such a declaration is not constitutionally required in order for the President to exercise his constitutional or statutory war powers, including his power to establish military commissions. Finally, the essay argues that the September 11 terrorist attacks, to which the Order was a response, violate the laws of war and therefore fall within the jurisdiction of military commissions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: military commissions, military tribunals, commander in chief, declaration of war, terrorism, laws of war, armed conflictAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 28, 2002
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.781 seconds