Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=299239
 
 

References (45)



 
 

Citations (22)



 


 



Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter?


Robert A. Kagan


University of California, Berkeley - Center for the Study of Law and Society

Neil Gunningham


Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment; Australian National University (ANU) - Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet)

Dorothy Thornton


University of California, Berkeley - Center for the Study of Law and Society


Forthcoming in Law & Society Review

Abstract:     
It is widely assumed that national and subnational differences in regulation and regulatory enforcement account for differences in environmental performance by regulated businesses. Against this "regulatory regime" assumption, however, one can pose a counter-hypothesis: by the beginning of the 21st Century, particularly in economically advanced democracies, differences among regulatory regimes have narrowed sharply, and local social pressures, market incentives, and corporate environmental management are the chief determinants of variations in firm-level environmental performance. This article tests the "regulatory regime" and the counter-hypothesis, drawing on a study of 14 pulp and paper manufacturing mills in Australia, New Zealand, British Columbia, and the states of Washington and Georgia in the U.S. Over the last three decades, we find, tightening regulatory requirements and intensifying political pressures have brought about large improvements and considerable convergence in environmental performance by pulp manufacturers, most of which have gone "beyond compliance" in several ways. But significant firm-level differences in pollution control still exist. Relying on 1998-99 effluent data, we find that regulatory jurisdiction does not account for differences in environmental performance across facilities. Just as salient in explaining those differences are variables such as corporate profitability, pressures by local communities and environmental activists, and especially corporate environmental management style although no single set of variables is determinative. A broader historical perspective on our data, however, indicates that regulation still matters, since large improvements in corporate environmental controls have been associated with tightening regulatory requirements and intensifying political pressures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Kagan, Robert A. and Gunningham, Neil and Thornton, Dorothy, Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter?. Forthcoming in Law & Society Review. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=299239 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299239

Contact Information

Robert A. Kagan (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - Center for the Study of Law and Society ( email )
Berkeley, WA 94720-2150
United States
510-642-4038 (Phone)
Neil Gunningham
Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment ( email )
Fenner School
Australian Centre for Environmental Law
Canberra ACT 0200
Australia
+61 2 6249 3397 (Phone)
+61 2 6249 4899 (Fax)
Australian National University (ANU) - Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet) ( email )
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

Dorothy Thornton
University of California, Berkeley - Center for the Study of Law and Society ( email )
Berkeley, WA 94720-2150
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,958
Downloads: 416
Download Rank: 38,345
References:  45
Citations:  22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds