Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=299930
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (38)



 


 



With A Grain of Salt: What Consumer Privacy Surveys Don't Tell Us


Solveig M. Singleton


Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)

Jim Harper


The Cato Institute



Abstract:     
A tremendous amount of news coverage and analysis of privacy issues has been driven by surveys of consumers showing high levels of concern. For this study, the authors reviewed 23 privacy surveys to assess their real usefulness to policymakers. Polls rarely play as large a role in policymaking as they have in the context of privacy. The study explains why lawmakers are right to be skeptical of surveys as a guide to policymaking generally, and privacy in particular. The design of the survey format and questions can be used to manipulate survey results. In reviewing privacy surveys, the authors found almost universal use of "push-pull" questions or prompting for certain results. By contrast, the least manipulative form of surveys, unprompted surveys, show little concern for privacy as such, and more concern for crime issues like credit card fraud. Also, privacy surveys tend to lump together issues like credit card fraud, spam, and marketing under the heading of "privacy," making it difficult to identify consumer concerns with precision. Surveys generally, and privacy surveys in particular, also suffer from the "talk is cheap" problem. It costs a consumer nothing to express a desire for federal law to protect privacy. But if such law became a reality, it will cost the economy as a whole, and consumers in particular, significant amounts that surveys do not and cannot reveal. By contrast, more objective measures of consumer actions show that, whatever consumers may say, they are going online and buying online in droves. In 1999, several forecasters predicted that electronic commerce would grow slowly because of the public's concerns about privacy. But this gloomy scenario has not come to pass, with electronic commerce revenues growing far faster than projected. The authors conclude that the craze for privacy surveys may be chalked up partly to the fact that for much of the debate no other information about the costs and benefits of privacy has been available. They further conclude that the surveys are not a sound basis for public policy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: privacy, privacy surveys, privacy polls, opt-in, opt-out, Jupiter study, Internet, data protection, credit card fraud, consumer protection, electronic commerce, technophobia, Internet regulation, cyberlaw, cyberspace, Big Brother, cookies, spam, identity theft, identity fraud, online privacy

JEL Classification: D1, D7, K2, M3

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 11, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Singleton, Solveig M. and Harper, Jim, With A Grain of Salt: What Consumer Privacy Surveys Don't Tell Us. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=299930 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299930

Contact Information

Solveig M. Singleton (Contact Author)
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) ( email )
1899 L St. NW
12th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-331-1010 (Phone)
202-331-0640 (Fax)
Jim Harper
The Cato Institute ( email )
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,249
Downloads: 495
Download Rank: 31,799
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  38

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.610 seconds