Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=301381
 
 

References (3)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Equivalence Between the FCF Method, the CCF Method and the APV Approach


Joseph Tham


Duke University - Duke Center for International Development in the Sanford School of Public Policy

Nicholas X. Wonder


Western Washington University - College of Business & Economics

February 2002


Abstract:     
In a recent paper, Ruback (2000) assumes that the discount rate for the tax shield in the Adjusted Present Value (APV) approach is the cost of debt and shows that the Capital Cash Flow (CCF) method and the Adjusted Present Value (APV) approach give different answers for the levered value. In this paper, using a simple numerical example with the Miles and Ezzell formulation for the tax shield, we show that the Free Cash Flow (FCF) method, the Capital Cash Flow (CCF) method and the APV approach give the same answers. The FCF method captures the benefit of the tax shield by "lowering" the cost of capital, the CCF method adds the tax shield directly to the FCF and the APV approach calculates the value of the tax shield separately. We organize the paper as follows. In Section One, we briefly review the assumptions underlying the three methods. In Section Two, we use a simple five-period binomial process to represent a finite stream of free cash flow and calculate the unlevered value with the risk-neutral method. In Section Three, we introduce risk-free debt financing with risk-free tax shields, and calculate the levered value with the three ways, the Free Cash Flow (FCF) method, the Capital Cash Flow (CCF) method and the APV approach. In addition, we verify that the APV approach is consistent with the answer from the risk-neutral method.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: WACC, Free cash flow, Capital cash flow, Adjusted present value, Risk-neutral valuation

JEL Classification: D61, G31, H43

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 26, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Tham, Joseph and Wonder, Nicholas X., Equivalence Between the FCF Method, the CCF Method and the APV Approach (February 2002). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=301381 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301381

Contact Information

Joseph Tham
Duke University - Duke Center for International Development in the Sanford School of Public Policy ( email )
Box 90312
302, Towerview Dr, Rubenstein Hall, Room 272
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-9234 (Phone)
919-681-0831 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://fds.duke.edu/db/Sanford/faculty/thamjx
Nicholas X. Wonder (Contact Author)
Western Washington University - College of Business & Economics ( email )
Department of Finance and Marketing
Bellingham, WA 98225-9071
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,561
Downloads: 1,373
Download Rank: 6,886
References:  3
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds