Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=301650
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



Two Fallacies About DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement


David H. Kaye


Penn State Law


Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 67, Fall 2001

Abstract:     
This commentary on the article Legal and Policy Issues in Expanding the Scope of Law Enforcement DNA Data Banks, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 127 (2001), by Mark Rothstein and Sandra Carnahan, argues that the case for confining law enforcement DNA databases to noncoding loci and to samples from individuals convicted of violent crimes is quite weak.

It describes alternative approaches, including the possibility of a population-wide database; the privacy implications of the loci now used in forensic identification; the law governing DNA dragnets; and the limits on DNA databases imposed by recent cases on searches and seizures. It notes the importance of addressing issues of racial equality along with privacy concerns in designing DNA databases for law enforcement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: bioethics, privacy, databases, criminal procedure, search and seizure

JEL Classification: K14, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., Two Fallacies About DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement. Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 67, Fall 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=301650 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301650

Contact Information

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
814 865-8974 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.psu.edu/faculty/resident_faculty/kaye
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,170
Downloads: 225
Download Rank: 78,182
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.531 seconds