Comity and Sovereign Debt Litigation: A Bankruptcy Analogy
Stephen M. Bainbridge
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Maryland Journal of Int'l Law and Trade, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1986
On repeated occasions in the post-war period, the cumulative effects of policy mistakes, recessions, inflation, and other economic problems have made it difficult for sovereign debtors to service their external debt. Unlike a domestic U.S. private debtor, who may resort to formal bankruptcy procedures in the event of insolvency, a defaulting sovereign debtor has no formal mechanism for triggering a restructuring of its debt.
In some cases, sovereign debtors have resorted to a moratorium on debt payments. This article argues that U.S. courts ought to give effect to such moratoria under the international law principle of comity. Using standard game theory methodology (the so-called "creditors dilemma" variant of the famous "prisoners dilemma"), the article argues that creditors of such debtors would agree in advance to give effect to such a moratorium provided it neither repudiated the sovereign's debts not gave preference to certain creditors. A legal test for granting comity to sovereign debt moratoria is therefore proposed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
JEL Classification: K20, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 12, 2002
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.860 seconds