Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=302374
 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



Daubert and Litigation-Driven Econometrics


Kevin A. Kordana


University of Virginia - School of Law

Terrance O'Reilly


Willamette University - College of Law


As published in Virginia Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 2019-2027, November 2001

Abstract:     
This paper examines the feasibility of a proposed criterion for the admission of expert econometric testimony. Professor David Kaye suggests that the admissibility of testimony by experts in economic statistics should turn on whether the statistical method applied by an expert is recognized as valid when applied to the type of problem at issue in the case. Kaye refers to this as determining the validity of the "major premise" of the statistical method employed in the proposed testimony. According to Kaye, if that threshold determination is favorable, the jury should decide whether the statistical method is properly applied to the specific problem at issue in the case - what Kaye calls the "minor premise" of the proposed testimony.

This paper suggests that Kaye's proposed distinction between major and minor premises in social science research is largely illusory. In practice, econometric methods must be carefully tailored to the data available for the investigation of an economic market. In many, perhaps most, cases, there might not be any method generally recognized as valid when applied to the type of economic problem at issue in a particular case. Further, the distinction between a new economic model and a variation on an existing model does not appear to be a scientific distinction, so it is not clear what principles would inform a judge in drawing a line between the two.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Daubert, admission of expert testimony

JEL Classification: C4, C5, K4

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 28, 2003 ; Last revised: August 25, 2009

Suggested Citation

Kordana, Kevin A. and O'Reilly, Terrance, Daubert and Litigation-Driven Econometrics. As published in Virginia Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 2019-2027, November 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=302374

Contact Information

Kevin A. Kordana (Contact Author)
University of Virginia - School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
804-924-3680 (Phone)
804-924-7536 (Fax)

Terrance O'Reilly
Willamette University - College of Law ( email )
245 Winter St. SE
Salem, OR 97301
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,256
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 144,153
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds