Section 367: A 'Wimp' for Inversions and a 'Bully' for Real Cross-Border Acquisitions

Samuel C. Thompson, Jr.

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law

Tax Notes, Vol. 94, No. 11, March 18, 2002

Pure inversion transactions involve reorganizing a publicly held U.S. corporation as a subsidiary of a newly formed, publicly held foreign holding company. These transactions avoid the controlled foreign corporation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and are equivalent to the de facto adoption of a territorial system of taxation. Until and unless Congress decides to repeal or reform the controlled foreign corporation provisions, Congress and the U.S. Treasury should take steps to protect the integrity of these provisions by removing the incentive for companies to engage in pure inversion transactions. Section 367 is an inadequate tool (that is, is a wimp) in dealing with these transactions, and this article sets out a proposal that would be an effective deterrent. This article also argues that section 367 is too intrusive (that is, is a bully) in business-motivated cross-border acquisitive reorganizations involving substantial companies and therefore should be liberalized for these transactions.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 15, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Thompson, Jr., Samuel C., Section 367: A 'Wimp' for Inversions and a 'Bully' for Real Cross-Border Acquisitions. Tax Notes, Vol. 94, No. 11, March 18, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=304221

Contact Information

Samuel C. Thompson, Jr. (Contact Author)
Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law ( email )
150 South College Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,318

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds