|
||||
|
||||
Human Nature and the Best Consequentialist Moral SystemLouis KaplowHarvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Steven ShavellHarvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) February 2002 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 349 Abstract: In this article, we ask what system of moral rules would be best from a consequentialist perspective, given certain aspects of human nature. This question is of inherent conceptual interest and is important to explore in order better to understand the moral systems that we observe and to illuminate longstanding debates in moral theory. We make what seem to be plausible assumptions about aspects of human nature and the moral sentiments and then derive conclusions about the optimal consequentialist moral system - concerning which acts should be deemed right and wrong, and to what degree. We suggest that our results have some correspondence with observed moral systems and also help to clarify certain points of disagreement among moral theorists.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 working papers seriesDate posted: March 18, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.468 seconds