SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (133)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigations as Off-line Reflective Practice

John S. Carroll
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management

Jenny W. Rudolph
Boston College - Wallace E. Carroll School of Management

Sachi Hatakenaka
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management


March 2002

MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4359-02

Abstract:     
Learning from experience, the cyclical interplay of thinking and doing, is increasingly important as organizations struggle to cope with rapidly changing environments and more complex and interdependent sets of knowledge. This paper confronts two central issues for organizational learning: (1) how is local learning (by individuals or small groups) integrated into collective learning by organizations? and (2) what are the differences between learning practices that focus on control, elimination of surprises, and single-loop incremental "fixing" of problems with those that focus on deep or radical learning, double-loop challenging of assumptions, and discovery of new opportunities? We articulate these relationships through an analysis of particular learning practices in highhazard organizations, specifically, problem investigation teams that examine the most serious and troubling events and trends in nuclear power plants and chemical plants. We first distinguish a controlling orientation from a rethinking orientation, and illustrate learning practices with three case studies from the nuclear power and chemical industries and a questionnaire study of three nuclear power plants. We then extend our framework to create a four-stage model of organizational learning: (1) local learning by decentralized individuals and work groups, (2) constrained learning in a context of compliance with rules, (3) open learning prompted by acknowledgement of doubt and desire to learn, and (4) deep learning based on skillful inquiry and systemic mental models. These four stages contrast whether learning is primarily single-loop or double-loop, i.e., whether the organization can surface and challenge the assumptions and mental models underlying behavior, and whether learning is relatively improvised or structured. We conclude with a discussion of the stages, levels of learning (team, organizational, and individual), and the role of action, thinking, and emotion in organizational learning.

Working Paper Series

Date posted: April 03, 2002 ; Last revised: April 05, 2002

Contact Information

John S. Carroll (Contact Author)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management ( email )
E52-563
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-2617 (Phone)
617-253-2660 (Fax)
Sachi Hatakenaka
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management ( email )
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
Jenny W. Rudolph
Boston College - Wallace E. Carroll School of Management ( email )
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,671
Downloads: 547
Download Rank: 12,549
References: 133

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.