|
||||
|
||||
Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective
Daron Acemoglu Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) James A. Robinson Harvard University - Department of Government; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) March 2002 CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3261 Abstract: We construct a simple model where political elites may block technological and institutional development, because of a 'political replacement effect.' Innovations often erode elites' incumbency advantage, increasing the likelihood that they will be replaced. Fearing replacement, political elites are unwilling to initiate change, and may even block economic development. We show that elites are unlikely to block development when there is a high degree of political competition, or when they are highly entrenched. It is only when political competition is limited and also their power is threatened that elites will block development. We also show that such blocking is more likely to arise when political stakes are higher, and that external threats may reduce the incentives to block. We argue that this model provides an interpretation for why Britain, Germany and the US industrialized during the nineteenth century, while the landed aristocracy in Russia and Austria-Hungary blocked development.
Keywords: Political economy, institutions, development, industrialization JEL Classifications: H20, N10, O10, O30, O40 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: April 11, 2002 ; Last revised: April 11, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 4 in 3.360 seconds.