Abstract

 
 

References (30)



 
 

Citations (15)



 


 



Conservative Accounting Choices


Mark Bagnoli


Purdue University

Susan G. Watts


Purdue University

March 2004


Abstract:     
Managers have sufficient discretion under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to adopt more or less conservative financial reporting policies. In this paper, we develop a signaling model to provide insight into managers' decisions to be conservative in their accounting. We provide conditions under which the market can use the manager's exercise of discretion to infer her private information about the future prospects of the firm and thus firm value. Under these conditions, we also show that there are meaningful differences between earnings response coefficients for firms whose managers choose a conservative reporting policy and those whose managers do not. Finally, we use our theoretical model to provide intuition for some established empirical results on earnings response coefficients.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Conservative accounting, asymmetric information, signaling

JEL Classification: C72, D82, G12, M41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Bagnoli, Mark E. and Watts, Susan G., Conservative Accounting Choices (March 2004). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=311432 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.311432

Contact Information

Mark E. Bagnoli (Contact Author)
Purdue University ( email )
Department of Accounting
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1310
United States
765-494-4484 (Phone)
765-496-1778 (Fax)
Susan G. Watts
Purdue University ( email )
Department of Accounting
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1310
United States
765-494-4504 (Phone)
765-496-1778 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,585
Downloads: 1,378
Download Rank: 5,415
References:  30
Citations:  15

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds