|
||||
|
||||
Takeover Defenses Under Delaware Law, the Proposed Thirteenth EU Directive and the New German Takeover Law: Comparison and Recommendations for Reform
Richard W. Painter University of Minnesota Law School Christian Kirchner Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Law; Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Economics American Journal of Comparative Law, 2002 Abstract: This article compares (i) Germany's highly protectionist 2001 corporate takeover law, (ii) the proposed EU Thirteenth Directive (which endorses the very different market oriented "strict neutrality rule" of the London City Code) and (iii) Delaware's "modified business judgment rule" which lies somewhere between these two approaches. The article also discusses some of the political and economic explanations for Germany's approach to hostile takeovers. The last section of the article discusses a fourth approach favored by the authors: allowing managers to initiate defenses against hostile tender offers but then allowing shareholders to veto management initiated defensive tactics through voting on the Internet.
JEL Classifications: F3, KO Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 31, 2002 ; Last revised: February 28, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.141 seconds.