|
||||
|
||||
Takeover Defenses Under Delaware Law, the Proposed Thirteenth EU Directive and the New German Takeover Law: Comparison and Recommendations for ReformRichard W. PainterUniversity of Minnesota Law School Christian KirchnerHumboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Law; Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Economics American Journal of Comparative Law, 2002 Abstract: This article compares (i) Germany's highly protectionist 2001 corporate takeover law, (ii) the proposed EU Thirteenth Directive (which endorses the very different market oriented "strict neutrality rule" of the London City Code) and (iii) Delaware's "modified business judgment rule" which lies somewhere between these two approaches. The article also discusses some of the political and economic explanations for Germany's approach to hostile takeovers. The last section of the article discusses a fourth approach favored by the authors: allowing managers to initiate defenses against hostile tender offers but then allowing shareholders to veto management initiated defensive tactics through voting on the Internet.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 JEL Classification: F3, KO Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 31, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds