Ownership Form and Trapped Capital in the Hospital Industry
Yale Law School; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Daniel P. Kessler
Stanford Graduate School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Mark B. McClellan
Brookings Institution; Council of Economic Advisors; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Stanford Graduate School of Business
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 266
Over the past 20 years, demand for acute care hospital services has declined more rapidly than has hospital capacity. This paper investigates the extent to which the preponderance of the nonprofit form in this industry might account for this phenomenon. We test whether rates of exit from the hospital industry differ significantly across the different forms of ownership, and especially whether secular nonprofit hospitals reduce capacity more slowly than do other types of hospitals. We estimate the effect of population changes (a proxy for changes in demand) at the zip-code level between 1985 and 1994 on changes in the capacity of for-profit, secular nonprofit, religious nonprofit, and public hospitals over the same period, holding constant metropolitan statistical area (MSA) fixed effects and other 1985 baseline characteristics of residential zip codes. We find that for-profit hospitals are the most responsive to reductions in demand, followed in turn by public and religiously affiliated nonprofit hospitals, while secular nonprofits are distinctly the least responsive of the four ownership types.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: nonprofit, hospitals, exit, capacity, capital, ownership, supply response
JEL Classification: G32, I11, L30working papers series
Date posted: December 4, 2002
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.531 seconds