|
||||
|
||||
Courts: The Lex Mundi Project
Simeon Djankov Ministry of Finance Rafael La Porta Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Florencio Lopez de Silanes EDHEC Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Tinbergen Institute Andrei Shleifer Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) April 2002 CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3344 Abstract: In cooperation with Lex Mundi member law firms in 109 countries, we measure and describe the exact procedures used by litigants and courts to evict a tenant for non-payment of rent and to collect a bounced check. We use these data to construct an index of procedural formalism of dispute resolution for each country. We find that such formalism is systematically greater in civil than in common law countries. Moreover, procedural formalism is associated with higher expected duration of judicial proceedings, more corruption, less consistency, less honesty, less fairness in judicial decisions, and inferior access to justice. These results suggest that legal transplantation may have led to an inefficiently high level of procedural formalism, particularly in developing countries.
Keywords: Enforcement of contracts, courts, judicial efficiency JEL Classifications: K40, P50 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: June 04, 2002 ; Last revised: January 05, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 1.344 seconds.