|
||||
|
||||
Small Countries and Preferential Trade Agreements: How Severe is the Innocent Bystander Problem?M. Ayhan KoseInternational Monetary Fund (IMF) Raymond G. RiezmanUniversity of Iowa - Henry B. Tippie College of Business - Department of Economics; GEP; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 7, pp. 279-304, 2002 Abstract: In this paper the welfare implications of preferential trade agreements (PTA) are examined from the perspective of small countries in the context of a multi-country general equilibrium model. We calibrate our model to represent one relatively small country and two symmetric big countries. We consider two cases. In one case, the small country is an 'innocent bystander', that is, it is left out of a PTA between the two large countries. In the second case, the small country signs a PTA with one of the large countries. We simulate the model and calculate consumption allocations, prices, trade volume, and tariffs in these two cases considering three different equilibria: free trade (FT), free trade association (FTA) and customs union (CU). We find that free trade is the best outcome for the small country. If the large country PTA takes the form of a CU then the cost of being an 'innocent bystander' is very large. If it is an FTA then the cost of being an 'innocent bystander' is relatively modest. In fact, the small country prefers to be an 'innocent bystander' to being a member of an FTA with one of the large countries.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 15, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.625 seconds