|
||||
|
||||
Estimation, Inference, and Specification Testing for Possibly Misspecified Quantile RegressionHalbert L. White, Jr.University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Economics Tae-Hwan KimUniversity of Nottingham - School of Economics; Yonsei University - Seoul Campus - College of Business and Economics April 2002 U of California San Diego, Economics Discussion Paper No. 2002-09 Abstract: To date the literature on quantile regression and least absolute deviation regression has assumed either explicitly or implicitly that the conditional quantile regression model is correctly specified. When the model is misspecified, confidence intervals and hypothesis tests based on the conventional covariance matrix are invalid. Although misspecification is a generic phenomenon and correct specification is rare in reality, there has to date been no theory proposed for inference when a conditional quantile model may be misspecified. In this paper, we allow for possible misspecification of a linear conditional quantile regression model. We obtain consistency of the quantile estimator for certain "pseudo-true" parameter values and asymptotic normality of the quantile estimator when the model is misspecified. In this case, the asymptotic covariance matrix has a novel form, not seen in earlier work, and we provide a consistent estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix. We also propose a quick and simple test for conditional quantile misspecification based on the quantile residuals.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 Keywords: Quantile Estimation, Misspecification, Asymptotic Normality, Aysmptotic Covariance Matrix JEL Classification: C13, C14, C52 working papers seriesDate posted: July 30, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.453 seconds