|
||||
|
||||
Roundtable Discussion: Corporate GovernanceWilliam J. CarneyEmory University School of Law Jack B. JacobsGovernment of the State of Delaware - Court of Chancery Richard W. PainterUniversity of Minnesota Law School Robert PritzkerColson Associates, Inc.; The Marmon Group, Inc. Robert H. SitkoffHarvard Law School As published in Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, pp. 235-49, 2001 Abstract: This is a transcript of a roundtable discussion between Robert Pritzker of The Marmon Group, Inc., Vice-Chancellor Jack Jacobs of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and Law Professors William Carney, Richard Painter, and Robert Sitkoff, with Professor Carney serving as moderator. The general topic was corporate governance. Among other things the participants discussed the implications of information provided by Mr. Pritzker regarding Smith v. Van Gorkom. Mr. Pritzker stated that the $55 price and the one-week deadline were established by Jerry Van Gorkom, not the Pritzkers. Mr. Pritzker also described the terms and the motivations for the Pritzkers' contribution to the settlement. Finally, in addition to analysis of the Van Gorkom decision, the panel also discussed public and private boards of directors, the Caremark decision, and corporate charitable and political contributions. The roundtable was held under the auspices of the Theory Informs Business Practices Symposium at the Chicago-Kent College of Law on April 6, 2001.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 Keywords: Van Gorkom, Trans Union, Pritzker, Board of Directors, Caremark, Corporate Crime, Corporate Charity, Corporate Political Speech, Business Judgment Rule, Mergers, Takeovers JEL Classification: K22, L21, M14, G34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 29, 2002Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.593 seconds