Differential Framing of Environmental Disputes by Stakeholder Groups
Ralph C. Hanke
Bowling Green State University - College of Business Administration
Pennsylvania State University - Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation (CRCN)
Linda L. Putnam
Texas A&M University - Department of Speech Communication
July 25, 2002
AoM Conflict Management Division 2002 Mtgs. No. 13171
This paper contributes to a developing literature on the role of framing in organizational settings and in protracted environmental disputes in particular. The paper identifies four frame types (risk, conflict management, power, and views of nature frames) that can be used to understand how disputants make sense of environmental conflicts and offers predictions about differential use of these four frames by environmental disputants. Our results substantiate some differences in the frames utilized by different stakeholder groups - revealing predicable antagonisms as well as the presence of strange bedfellows. We link frame usage to the intractability of conflict and offer some recommendations for handling these frame-based disputes. Finally, our results suggest that greater insight into environmental conflicts may be derived from understanding the patterns of frames held by disputants rather than concentrating solely on interest-based stakeholder groupings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60
Date posted: July 26, 2002
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.406 seconds