SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (10)

Beta

 


 



Hedge Fund Returns: Auditing and Accuracy

Bing Liang
University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Finance & Operations Management; China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)




Abstract:     
It is mysterious that the same hedge fund may report different performance measures in different places. This paper explores why it is the case. We find that auditing plays an important role in explaining this difference. Due to the private nature, a significant amount of hedge funds are not effectively audited. Especially, defunct funds are less effectively audited than live funds. Empirical results show that audited funds have much less return discrepancy than non-audited funds. There is a positive correlation between the auditing variable and fund size. Large funds tend to be audited while small funds tend not to be. In addition, those funds that are listed on exchanges, fund of funds, funds with both domestic and foreign investors, funds open to the public, funds invested in a single industrial sector, and unleveled funds have less return discrepancy than the other funds.

Note: This is a description of the paper and not the actual abstract.

Keywords: hedge funds, auditing, return accuracy

JEL Classifications: M41, M49, G23

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: October 10, 2002 ; Last revised: September 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Liang, Bing, Hedge Fund Returns: Auditing and Accuracy (2002). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=321720


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Bing Liang (Contact Author)
University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Finance & Operations Management ( email )
Amherst, MA 01003
United States
China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)
1954 Huashan Road
Shanghai P.R.China, 200030 China

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,594
Downloads: 0
Citations: 10

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.110 seconds.