SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (40)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

(Mostly) Against Exceptionalism

R. Polk Wagner
University of Pennsylvania Law School


April 2002

U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 02-18; U of Penn. Law School, Pub. Law Research Paper No. 07

Abstract:     
This Essay delves into issues surrounding the relationship between technology and the patent law. Responding to Dan Burk and Mark Lemley's Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle, the piece notes that the basic question posed by that article - whether the patent law is "technology-specific" - is a relatively easy question, given the several doctrines that explicitly link the subject matter context of an invention to the validity and scope of related patents. This sort of technological exceptionalism (which the Essay refers to as TYPE I exceptionalism) is both extant and easily justifiable for a legal regime directed to technology policy. It is a broader sort of exceptionalism (TYPE II) that is far more troublesome, implying a role for the patent law in quite detailed policy judgments, such as the optimal breadth for biotechnological patents (as Burk and Lemley suggest). The Essay offers a variety of reasons that TYPE II exceptionalism is unwarranted, and indeed, notes that a primary claim of Burk and Lemley's - that the Federal Circuit has grossly missed the mark in its (purportedly) exceptionalist approach - previews the sort of problems created by pursuing technological exceptionalism in the patent law.

Keywords: patents, patent law, technology, POSITA, exceptionalism, Federal Circuit, claim construction, obviousness, validity, biotechnology, Lourie

Working Paper Series

Date posted: August 13, 2002 ; Last revised: October 13, 2008

Suggested Citation

Wagner, R. Polk, (Mostly) Against Exceptionalism (April 2002). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 02-18; U of Penn. Law School, Pub. Law Research Paper No. 07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=321981 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.321981


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

R. Polk Wagner (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
267-433-4431 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,131
Downloads: 250
Download Rank: 33,614
Footnotes: 40

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.078 seconds.