|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id323621. ; Size: 341K
|
|
Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance:
A Cross-Country Analysis
Krishna Palepu Harvard University - Harvard Business School; Harvard University - David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Research; Harvard Business Review; NBER
Tarun Khanna Harvard University - Strategy Unit
Joseph Kogan Lehman Brothers, New York
August 9, 2002
Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 02-31; Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 02-041; Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 02-041
Abstract:
Some scholars have argued that globalization should pressure firms to adopt a common set of the most efficient corporate governance practices, while others maintain that such convergence will not occur because of a variety of forms of path-dependence. With new data on governance in 24 developing countries as well as data on laws protecting shareholders and creditors in 49 developed and developing countries, we search for evidence that globalization is correlated with similarity in corporate governance. We find robust evidence of de jure similarity in governance. Interestingly, this is not driven by convergence to U.S. standards. Rather pairs of economically interdependent countries - especially if the countries are both economically developed - appear to adopt common corporate governance standards, even after accounting for the effects of common legal origin. In contrast to the de jure results, we find virtually no evidence of de facto similarity in corporate governance in a battery of estimations at the country, industry and firm levels. This is consistent with either the proposition that complementarities result in different national systems appropriately having different corporate governance systems, or the proposition that globalization is not strong enough to overcome local vested interests. We conclude that globalization may have induced the adoption of some common corporate governance standards but that there is little evidence that these standards have been implemented.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: globalization, corporate governance, finance, accounting
JEL Classification: G34, M41, M44, M46
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: October 14, 2002
Suggested CitationPalepu, Krishna, Khanna, Tarun and Kogan, Joseph, Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance:
A Cross-Country Analysis (August 9, 2002). Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 02-31; Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 02-041; Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 02-041. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=323621 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.323621
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
How Important is Corporate Governance?
By
David Larcker,
Scott Richardson, ...
2.
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance
By
Lawrence Brown
and
Marcus Caylor
3.
International Corporate Governance
By
Diane Denis
and
John Mcconnell
4.
What Matters in Corporate Governance?
By
Lucian Bebchuk,
Alma Cohen, ...
5.
Corporate Governance and Control
By
Marco Becht,
Patrick Bolton, ...
6.
Corporate Governance: Theories, Challenges and Paradigms
By
Shann Turnbull
7.
The State of Corporate Governance Research
By
Lucian Bebchuk
and
Michael Weisbach
8.
Corporate Governance in the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis: Evidence from Financial Institutions Worldwide
By
David Erkens,
Mingyi Hung, ...
9.
Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance
By
Robert Bushman
and
Abbie Smith
10.
Corporate Governance and Earnings Management
By
Sonda Marrakchi Chtourou,
Jean Bédard, ...
|
|
|
|