Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=325722
 
 

Citations



 


 



The Normative Functions of Coercion Claims


Mitchell N. Berman


University of Pennsylvania Law School


U of Texas Law School, Public Law Research No. 40

Abstract:     
Recent decades have witnessed a marked increase in efforts to craft a satisfactory definition of coercion. Despite substantial gains in understanding, however, much about coercion remains obscure. This article argues that prior bids to define coercion have not fully succeeded largely because scholars have been seduced by the vision of a single unified concept. This is a mistake, for coercion talk is employed to perform two very different normative functions. First, we apply the coercion label to signal that a given proposal is morally bad and, relatedly, that its maker is morally blameworthy. Second, coercion claims are used to excuse (fully or partially) an individual for engaging in action that would otherwise warrant moral or legal censure.

This article demonstrates that the sets of conditions that constitute coercion for these two normative purposes are distinct. In substantiating this thesis, the article identifies the necessary and sufficient conditions that validate each of the two basic types of coercion claims, and also unravels the puzzling relationship among the terms "coercion", "threat", and "offer". Lastly, it shows how distinguishing these two normative functions enables us to resolve a myriad of much - debated cases from the philosophical literature. It is hoped that careful attention to the distinct functions of coercion claims will be of use to legal theorists operating in a wide range of fields, including criminal law, constitutional law, and contracts.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: September 4, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Berman, Mitchell N., The Normative Functions of Coercion Claims. U of Texas Law School, Public Law Research No. 40. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=325722

Contact Information

Mitchell N. Berman (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,292

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds