Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=325940
 


 



Estate of Strangi, Section 2036, and the Continuing Relevance of Byrum


Brant J. Hellwig


University of South Carolina - School of Law


Tax Notes, Vol. 96, No. 9, August 26, 2002

Abstract:     
This report analyzes the potential application of section 2036(a) to limited partnerships employed for estate planning purposes, using the facts of Tax Court case of Estate of Strangi v. Commissioner as a guide. Particular emphasis is placed on the Commissioner's argument for inclusion under section 2036(a)(2) based on the taxpayer's control over the property transferred to the partnership, as well as the taxpayer's argument under the Supreme Court case of United States v. Byrum that the existence of the taxpayer's fiduciary duty to the partnership negates the application of section 2036 altogether. The report concludes that, because the essential facts of United States v. Byrum are lacking in the estate planning partnership context, the Byrum decision should not shield taxpayers using limited partnerships as a trust substitute from the application of section 2036(a)(2).

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: August 23, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Hellwig, Brant J., Estate of Strangi, Section 2036, and the Continuing Relevance of Byrum. Tax Notes, Vol. 96, No. 9, August 26, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=325940

Contact Information

Brant J. Hellwig (Contact Author)
University of South Carolina - School of Law ( email )
Main & Greene Streets
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 645

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds