Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=329362
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (317)



 


 



Constitutional Conscience


Eric L. Muller


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law

September 2002

U of No. Carolina, Public Law Research Paper No. 02-5

Abstract:     
Eight years before the Supreme Court's 1952 Rochin decision, which announced the "shocks the conscience" test for a substantive due process violation in criminal cases, a federal district judge applied that test to dismiss criminal charges against twenty-six Japanese American internees who had been charged with resisting the military draft during World War II. It was shocking to the conscience, the judge held, for the government to incarcerate Japanese Americans on account of their race, draft them into the army from within their internment camps, and then prosecute them when they resisted.

That decision, while morally courageous, was open to all of the criticism (for its subjectivity) that has always dogged the "shocks the conscience" test and its criminal-law cousin, the "outrageous government conduct" defense. From the moment of its endorsement by the Supreme Court in Rochin, the "shocks the conscience" test has been pilloried as an unadorned, unexplained, and lawless judicial veto of executive conduct.

This article uses the case of the Japanese American draft resisters to explore the question of whether it is possible to construct a substantive due process inquiry in criminal cases that is better grounded in mainstream constitutional methodology than the current, much-maligned doctrine. The article develops the notion of shock to a "constitutional conscience", as opposed to a merely visceral conscience, and looks to accepted sources of constitutional meaning (historical practice, tradition, and the meaning of related constitutional text) to explain what was constitutionally conscience-shocking about the government's treatment of the Japanese American draft resisters of World War II.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 95

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Japanese Internment, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Constitutional Interpretation, Constitutional History

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Muller, Eric L., Constitutional Conscience (September 2002). U of No. Carolina, Public Law Research Paper No. 02-5. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=329362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.329362

Contact Information

Eric L. Muller (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-7067 (Phone)
919-962-1277 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,653
Downloads: 194
Download Rank: 90,243
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  317

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.547 seconds