Citations (3)



Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory Policymaking

Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Law School

September 1, 2002

KSG Working Paper No. RWP02-038

Researchers who evaluate ordinary dispute resolution procedures understandably ask whether disputants are eventually satisfied with the resulting outcomes. But how should they evaluate techniques for involving the public in regulatory policymaking, i.e., techniques such as comment solicitation, public hearings, workshops, dialogue groups, advisory committees, and negotiated rulemaking processes? Researchers evaluating these various techniques have also typically used participant satisfaction as a key evaluative criterion. While this criterion may seem suitable for evaluating private dispute resolution techniques, those who disagree in policy-making processes are not disputants in the same sense that landlords and tenants, creditors and debtors, or tortfeasors and victims are disputants in private life. Disputes in regulatory policymaking arise over public policy, not over private grievances. This paper raises caution about using participant satisfaction, or other measures based on participants' attitudes and opinions, in evaluating dispute resolution and public participation in regulatory policymaking. It argues that a reliance on participant satisfaction encounters two conceptual limitations, namely that (a) participant satisfaction does not necessarily equate with good public policy and (b) participant satisfaction is at best an incomplete measure because it excludes those who do not participate. In addition, the paper outlines a series of problems in applying, measuring, and interpreting participant satisfaction that make it a problematic metric for evaluating public participation in regulatory processes. In light of the conceptual and measurement problems with relying on satisfaction, evaluation researchers should resist relying on participant surveys to evaluate public participation techniques, and instead should focus attention directly on the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of the decisions that result from different forms of public participation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Regulatory Policymaking, Negotiation, Public Participation, Evaluation, Administrative Law

JEL Classification: K20, L50

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 22, 2002 ; Last revised: February 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Coglianese, Cary, Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory Policymaking (September 1, 2002). THE PROMISE AND PERFORMANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION, Rosemary O'Leary & Lisa Bingham eds., 2003; KSG Working Paper No. RWP02-038. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=331420 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.331420

Contact Information

Cary Coglianese (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-6867 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/coglianese
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,008
Downloads: 844
Download Rank: 19,739
Citations:  3

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds