|
||||
|
||||
Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality
Jeffrey A. Frankel Harvard University - John F. Kennedy School of Government; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Andrew K. Rose University of California - Haas School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) September 2002 NBER Working Paper No. W9201 Abstract: What is the effect of trade on a country's environment, for a given level of GDP? Some have observed an apparent positive correlation between openness to trade and measures of environmental quality. But this could be due to endogeneity of trade, rather than causality. This paper uses exogenous determinants of trade - geographical variables from the gravity model - as instruments to isolate the effect of openness. The finding is that trade may indeed have a beneficial effect on three measures of air pollution. Statistical significance is lacking for Particulate Matter, but is moderate for NO2, and high for SO2. Results for broader environmental measures are not as encouraging, but one can at least say that there is little evidence that trade has the detrimental effect on the environment that the race-to-the-bottom theory would lead one to expect. The larger effect appears to come via income itself: our results generally support the environmental Kuznets curve, which says that growth harms the environment at low levels of income and helps at high levels, and to support the proposition that openness to trade accelerates the growth process.
JEL Classifications: Q2, F1 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 20, 2002 ; Last revised: October 07, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollob 1 in 0.266 seconds.