Citations (3)


Footnotes (47)



Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'

Claire A. Hill

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law

Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2001

Business contracts have been reviled since before the Marx Brothers' infamous 'there ain't no Sanity Clause' sketch as being replete with duplicative, cumbersome, inartful, and sometimes imprecise language. My article seeks to understand why practice apparently hasn't made perfect - why business contracts are not as clear, and only as long, as would seem to be optimal. I argue that the contract production process combines rational, and what some would consider irrational, elements to create a serviceable, but arguably second-best, product. I discuss dynamics of law firms and their clients that contribute to the continuing viability of an 'imperfect product.'

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

JEL Classification: L2, K22, L14

Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Hill, Claire A., Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=332941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332941

Contact Information

Claire Ariane Hill (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-6521 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,132
Downloads: 412
Download Rank: 42,120
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  47

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds