Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=332941
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'


Claire A. Hill


University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law


Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2001

Abstract:     
Business contracts have been reviled since before the Marx Brothers' infamous 'there ain't no Sanity Clause' sketch as being replete with duplicative, cumbersome, inartful, and sometimes imprecise language. My article seeks to understand why practice apparently hasn't made perfect - why business contracts are not as clear, and only as long, as would seem to be optimal. I argue that the contract production process combines rational, and what some would consider irrational, elements to create a serviceable, but arguably second-best, product. I discuss dynamics of law firms and their clients that contribute to the continuing viability of an 'imperfect product.'

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

JEL Classification: L2, K22, L14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Hill, Claire A., Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=332941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332941

Contact Information

Claire Ariane Hill (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-6521 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,028
Downloads: 406
Download Rank: 39,574
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds