|
||||
|
||||
Bad Beta, Good Beta
John Y. Campbell Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Tuomo Vuolteenaho Arrowstreet Capital, LP; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) August 2003 Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 2016 Abstract: This paper explains the size and value "anomalies" in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the CAPMbeta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in "bad" and "good" varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the CAPMsince 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices.
JEL Classifications: G12, G14, N22 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 23, 2002 ; Last revised: October 16, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.141 seconds.