Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=346500
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (315)



 


 



Conspiracy Theory


Neal Kumar Katyal


Georgetown University Law Center


Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, June 2003

Abstract:     
Over one-quarter of all federal criminal prosecutions and a large number of state cases involve prosecutions for conspiracy. Yet, the major scholarly articles and the bulk of prominent jurists have roundly condemned the doctrine. This Article offers a functional justification for the legal prohibition against conspiracy, centering on psychological and economic accounts. Advances in psychology over the past thirty years have demonstrated that groups cultivate a special social identity. This identity often encourages risky behavior, leads individuals to behave against their self-interest, solidifies loyalty, and facilitates harm against non-members. So, too, economists have developed sophisticated explanations for why firms promote efficiency, leading to new theories in corporate law. These insights can be "reverse-engineered" to make conspiracies operate less efficiently. In reverse-engineering corporate-law principles and introducing lessons from psychology, a rich account of how government should approach conspiracy begins to unfold.

In particular, law enforcement strives to prevent conspiracies from forming by imposing high up-front penalties for joiners but uses mechanisms to harvest information from those who have joined and decide to cooperate with the government. Traditional conspiracy doctrines such as Pinkerton liability and the exclusion from merger not only further cooperation agreements, they also make conspiracies more difficult to create and maintain by forcing them to adopt bundles of inefficient practices. The possibility of defection forces the syndicate to use expensive monitoring of its employees for evidence of possible collusion with the government. Mechanisms for defection also break down trust within the group and prime members to think that others are acting out of self-interest. The Article concludes by offering a variety of refinements to conspiracy law that will help destabilize trust within the conspiracy, cue the defection of conspirators, and permit law enforcement to extract more information from them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 81

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 23, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Katyal, Neal Kumar, Conspiracy Theory. Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, June 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=346500 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.346500

Contact Information

Neal K. Katyal (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9807 (Phone)
202-662-9410 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,738
Downloads: 814
Download Rank: 15,125
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  315

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds