Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=347363
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (214)



 


 



Unrealized Torts


John C. P. Goldberg


Harvard Law School

Benjamin C. Zipursky


Fordham University School of Law


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 88, 2002

Abstract:     
This article addresses negligence claims brought by persons who are placed at heightened risk of as-yet unmanifested injuries. It argues, first, that such claims are not rightly characterized as creating a class of "inchoate" torts: we maintain that there are no inchoate torts. Further, we note that the absence of inchoate torts, although difficult to explain on standard economic-deterrence views, is quite intelligible on a conception of tort as a law of civil recourse. Second, the article argues that claims for unripened injuries cannot be salvaged as claims for the "harm" of being exposed to heightened risk of illness. The duties of negligence law are duties to take care not cause full-blown injuries, not duties to avoid creating risks of injuries, and we offer several overlapping explanations as to why negligence law operates in terms of such duties. Third, the article asserts that heightened-risk claims are not well captured within the doctrinal category of "negligent infliction of emotional distress," in large part because the category itself does not make much sense. To the extent, claims for fear of future injury ought to be actionable, it is only in situations where that fear arises from the plaintiff's having been exposed to an objective threat of physical harm or disease. To the extent actionable, actions for negligence causing fear of future injury are thus best seen as close cousins of the ancient tort of assault. Finally, we maintain that suits seeking reimbursement for medical monitoring to detect the future onset of illness are best understood not as seeking compensatory damages for ripened torts, but instead as requesting equitable relief prior to ripening in the form of court-ordered funding of medical treatment. Conceptualizing medical monitoring suits in this manner, we argue, makes sense of the courts' reluctance to award lump sum damages to such claimants, and provides judges with a more coherent framework within which to determine when they should award funds for monitoring.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: assault, disease, duty, emotional distress, equitable relief, fear, future injury, harm, inchoate, injury, medical monitoring, negligence, recourse, risk, threat

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, John C. P. and Zipursky, Benjamin C., Unrealized Torts. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 88, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=347363 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.347363

Contact Information

John C. P. Goldberg (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
Areeda 232
1545 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-2086 (Phone)
Benjamin C. Zipursky
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,990
Downloads: 330
Download Rank: 51,808
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  214

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.860 seconds