Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come?

49 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2002

See all articles by Kym Anderson

Kym Anderson

University of Adelaide - Centre for International Economic Studies (CIES); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); Australian National University

Date Written: October 2002

Abstract

After a brief review of the literature to the early 1970s, this Paper assesses the contributions by economists during the past three decades to measuring the distortionary effects of trade policies. It does not pretend to be a comprehensive survey, but draws on selections from the literature that give a sense of the distance the profession has traveled from a trade policy practitioner's viewpoint since Corden's first paper on the subject in 1957. Phenomenal though that progress has been, there is ample room for further improvement in computing the economic (and other) effects of trade-related policies and their reform. The Paper concludes with suggestions of where the priorities should be in global modeling of trade policy reform, as the world moves into the next round of multilateral trade negotiations.

Keywords: Trade policy distortions, effective protection, cost of protection, empirical modelling of effects of trade policies

JEL Classification: F13, Q17

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Kym, Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come? (October 2002). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=348600

Kym Anderson (Contact Author)

University of Adelaide - Centre for International Economic Studies (CIES) ( email )

School of Economics
Adelaide SA 5005
Australia
+61 8 8313 4712 (Phone)
+61 8 8223 1460 (Fax)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

Australian National University ( email )

Arndt-Corden Dept of Economics
Coombs Building
Canberra, AK ACT 2600
Australia
+61 8 8313 4712 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://publicpolicy.anu.edu.au/crawford_people/content/staff/acde/kanderson.php

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
3,362
PlumX Metrics