SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (20)

Beta

 
 

Citations (5)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

A Comparison of Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information Disclosure as Remedies for Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-line Comic Book Market

Louis H. Ederington
University of Oklahoma - Division of Finance

Michael Dewally
Marquette University - Department of Finance


November 2002


Abstract:     
Signaling strategies which sellers of high quality securities, goods, or services employ to differentiate their securities or products from those of lower quality include: (1) developing a reputation for high quality, (2) certification by a respected third party (e.g., underwriters, bond rating agencies, and auditors, for securities, and testing laboratories for goods), (3) warranties (for goods), and (4) information disclosure (such as financial statements for securities and specifications and test results for goods). These signaling strategies are compared using data from the online comic book auction market. This market has a number of important advantages: (1) the information asymmetry is substantial, (2) good measures of reputation are available, and (3) there are many sellers employing different combinations of the four strategies. Of the four strategies, we find certification by a respected third party sends the strongest signal. On average certified comics sell for over 50% more than otherwise equivalent uncertified comics. Moreover it appears that part of this price premium is due to risk reduction, i.e., not all is due to differences in the expected quality of certified and uncertified books. We find that both how positive or negative the seller's reputation is and how well established that reputation is significantly impact the price though reputation is less important than certification. We find no evidence that warranties in the form of money-back guarantees impact the price. Apparently buyers reason that sellers of truly high quality books should seek certification so discount the presence of both warranties and positive reputations. Virtually all sellers disclose information in the form of scans and failure to do so lowers the price a modest amount. Since for a single sale, the seller's reputation is exogenous while the other three strategies are endogenous, we explore how a seller's strategy choices depend on her reputation.

Keywords: reputation, certification, warranties, information asymmetry, signaling, auctions

JEL Classifications: D82, D83, G14, D44

Working Paper Series

Date posted: January 16, 2003 ; Last revised: January 06, 2006

Suggested Citation

Ederington, Louis H. and Dewally, Michael, A Comparison of Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information Disclosure as Remedies for Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-line Comic Book Market (November 2002). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=351261 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.351261


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Louis H. Ederington (Contact Author)
University of Oklahoma - Division of Finance ( email )
Norman, OK 73019
United States
405-325-5591 (Phone)
405-325-7688 (Fax)
Michael Dewally
Marquette University - Department of Finance ( email )
Straz Hall, 318
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53233
United States
414-288-1442 (Phone)
414-288-5756 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,012
Downloads: 539
Download Rank: 12,773
References: 20
Citations: 5

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.