Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=353361
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (4)



 


 



Brown Vs. Board of Education: Law or Politics?


Michael J. Klarman


Harvard University

December 2002

UVA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 02-11

Abstract:     
This essay analyzes the justices' internal deliberations in Brown v. Board of Education, based on the conference notes, with the goal of explaining why they found the case so hard. (At the first conference discussion, in December 1952, it was not obvious whether a majority existed to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson). I argue that for several justices, most notably Frankfurter and Jackson, Brown presented a conflict between law (as they understood it) and politics. Though they thought racial segregation a clear moral evil, they did not believe it was unconstitutional according to the conventional sources of constitutional interpretation - text, original intent, precedent, custom. The essay also tries to explain how a closely divided Court became unanimous and why school segregation struck most justices as an obvious moral wrong at a time when the nation was divided down the middle.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 23, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Klarman, Michael J., Brown Vs. Board of Education: Law or Politics? (December 2002). UVA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 02-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=353361 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.353361

Contact Information

Michael J. Klarman (Contact Author)
Harvard University ( email )
1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,764
Downloads: 969
Download Rank: 11,715
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds