Footnotes (210)



The Future: Scrutinizing The Empirical Case For the Court of Federal Claims

Steven L. Schooner

George Washington University - Law School

November 21, 2002

GWU Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 50

The 20th anniversary of the Federal Courts Improvement Act (FCIA) presents an opportunity to reflect upon the unique role of the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC). The COFC has evolved into a jurisdictional catch-all, rather than a forum that serves a needed purpose. Although public contracts dominate the Court of Federal Claims' docket, the Court plays only a minor role in the field, and mere election of fora does not justify the Court's participation. Hence, this paper offers three reasons to challenge the viability of the Court's current mandate: (1) the Court is not a specialized court; (2) dispersal of the Court's docket would not unduly burden any receiving fora; and (3) because most of the Court's jurisdiction is concurrent and because (empirically) the Court is not the forum of choice, the benefits of forum election are illusory. Ultimately, the paper makes the empirical case that eliminating the Court could enhance efficiency and consistency, while reducing confusion in law and practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 86

JEL Classification: H59, K12, K23, K34, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 29, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Schooner, Steven L., The Future: Scrutinizing The Empirical Case For the Court of Federal Claims (November 21, 2002). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 70, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=355360 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.355360

Contact Information

Steven L. Schooner (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-3037 (Phone)
202-994-5614 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/Faculty/profile.aspx?id=1740%20
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,412
Downloads: 468
Download Rank: 42,532
Footnotes:  210

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds