Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=361040
 
 

Footnotes (85)



 


 



Fallen Superheroes and Constitutional Mirages: The Tale of Brady v. Maryland


Scott E. Sundby


University of Miami School of Law


McGeorge Law Review, Vol. 33

Abstract:     
This essay is based on a lecture given as part of the McGeorge School of Law's Distinguished Speaker Series. The essay examines Brady v. Maryland as one of the Warren Court's criminal procedure cases that has taken on superhero status, announcing not only an important procedural right, but doing so in ringing moral terms that forever associate the right with the case. In Brady, the majority crafted its holding that an accused has a constitutional right to material exculpatory evidence as embodying the prosecutor's ethical duty to pursue "justice" and not simply victory in the courtroom. By crafting the opinion in this way, Brady joined cases like Gideon, Miranda and Mapp as opinions that possess special rhetorical power because they are expressly founded upon fundamental values like equality, human dignity, and the morality of government.

This essay argues, however, that subsequent cases have largely robbed Brady of its superhero powers as a pre-trial discovery doctrine. By setting a very high threshold before exculpatory evidence becomes "material" and must be turned over - evidence that "could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict" - the Court essentially has turned Brady from a pre-trial discovery device into a post-trial safety net to catch cases of government misconduct. Indeed, the essay suggests that the materiality standard is now so high that a prosecutor who discovers true Brady evidence prior to trial should ethically be considering dismissal of the charges, let alone the need to turn the evidence over to the defense.

Because of Brady's limited usefulness as a pre-trial source for discovery, the essay urges that we not let the "mirage" of a constitutional right to discovery keep us from debating the need for broader discovery through statutory discovery rights and the rules of criminal procedure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 16, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Sundby, Scott E., Fallen Superheroes and Constitutional Mirages: The Tale of Brady v. Maryland. McGeorge Law Review, Vol. 33. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=361040 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.361040

Contact Information

Scott E. Sundby (Contact Author)
University of Miami School of Law ( email )
1311 Miller Dr.
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
305-284-5848 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,138
Downloads: 406
Download Rank: 41,263
Footnotes:  85

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds