Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=361760
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (194)



 


 



Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-Competitive Intellectual
Property Litigation


Michael J. Meurer


Boston University - School of Law


Boston College Law Review, 2003

Abstract:     
It is useful to think of intellectual property (IP) law both as a system of property rights that promotes the production of
valuable information and as a system of government regulation
that unintentionally promotes socially harmful rent-seeking.
This Article analyzes methods of controlling rent-seeking costs associated with opportunistic and anti-competitive IP lawsuits. My thinking is guided to some extent by the analysis of
procedural measures for controlling frivolous litigation, and analysis of antitrust reforms designed to control strategic abuse of antitrust law. These analogies lead me to focus on pre-trial and post-trial control measures that reduce the credibility of weak IP lawsuits. I conclude that intellectual property courts show some awareness of the value of fee-shifting and summary judgment as tools for controlling opportunistic and anti-competitive lawsuits. Courts display less awareness of the need to restrict preliminary injunctions or encourage declaratory judgments as control measures. Antitrust suits have only a limited role in deterring the most egregious anti-competitive conduct.

Besides attacking the credibility of weak lawsuits, it is probably desirable to eliminate the threat of some kinds of IP lawsuits entirely. This could be accomplished by eliminating or restricting IP rights such as business method patents, trade dress protection of product configuration and design, and copyright protection of art reproductions. In other words, it may be desirable to curtail the "standing" of parties who own IP rights that generate a substantial threat of opportunistic or anti-competitive litigation with little corresponding benefit in terms of productive incentives.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: Intellectual Property, Litigation, Frivolous Lawsuits, Predatory Litigation, Patent, Copyright, Trademark

JEL Classification: K2, L5

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 12, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Meurer, Michael J., Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation. Boston College Law Review, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=361760 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.361760

Contact Information

Michael J. Meurer (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-6292 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,742
Downloads: 504
Download Rank: 31,087
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  194
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Startups and Patent Trolls
By Colleen Chien

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds