|
||||
|
||||
The Effect of Automobile Insurance and Accident Liability Laws on Traffic Fatalities
Alma Cohen Tel Aviv University - Eitan Berglas School of Economics; Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Rajeev H. Dehejia National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Department of Economics, Tufts University; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 47, pp. 357-393, 2004 Abstract: This paper investigates the incentive effects of automobile insurance, compulsory insurance laws, and no-fault liability laws on driver behavior and traffic fatalities. We analyze a panel of 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia from 1970-1998, a period in which many states adopted compulsory insurance regulations and/or no-fault laws. Using an instrumental variables approach, we find evidence that automobile insurance has moral hazard costs, leading to an increase in traffic fatalities. We also find that reductions in accident liability produced by no-fault liability laws have led to an increase in traffic fatalities (estimated to be on the order of 6%). Overall, our results indicate that, whatever other benefits they might produce, increases in the incidence of automobile insurance and moves to no-fault liability systems have significant negative effects on traffic fatalities.
Keywords: No-fault laws, compulsory insurance, moral hazard JEL Classifications: G22, J28, K13 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 23, 2004 ; Last revised: August 06, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.125 seconds.