Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=368124
 
 

Footnotes (356)



 


 



Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice


Jenia Iontcheva Turner


Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 88, April 2003

Abstract:     
After a century of reform and experimentation, sentencing remains a highly contested area of the criminal justice system. Scholars as well as the public at large disagree about the proper purposes and functions of punishment, and dissatisfaction with the sentencing status quo is high. Most recent critiques of the sentencing process have focused on the amount of discretion tolerated by the system. This Article goes further in arguing that the source of sentencing discretion is also very important to the legitimacy and integrity of the sentencing process. In the absence of wide consensus on sentencing goals, it is best to leave the sentencing decision with a deliberative democratic institution - the jury.

This Article makes the case for jury sentencing from three perspectives: the historical, the theoretical, and the practical. Part I of this Article surveys the history of jury sentencing from colonial times to the present. This history reveals that jury sentencing - a uniquely American innovation - was a valued democratic institution in the early republic, but was gradually abandoned in the twentieth century as scientific approaches to punishment came into favor. The most recent developments from the Supreme Court suggest, however, that jury sentencing may be on the rise again. Part II enlists the insights of modern political theory, and particularly, the ideas of deliberative democratic theory, to show that the movement away from jury sentencing has not been entirely healthy for either the sentencing process or our democracy as a whole. Part III addresses the practical objections that have been leveled against jury sentencing, and suggests that the vast majority of these are either exaggerated or equally present in alternative sentencing regimes. The jury, therefore, emerges as an equally competent, yet more legitimate sentencing institution. Finally, Part IV outlines the actual contours of a possible jury sentencing regime that balances the democratic virtues of jury involvement with efficiency, uniformity, and other values important to the sentencing process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Keywords: juries, sentencing, jury sentencing, deliberative democracy, Apprendi, criminal law, criminal procedure

JEL Classification: K1, K4

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 24, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Iontcheva Turner, Jenia, Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 88, April 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=368124

Contact Information

Jenia Iontcheva Turner (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,616
Downloads: 214
Download Rank: 83,318
Footnotes:  356

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds