|
||||
|
||||
Investors' Interpretations of the October 15, 2002 Standard & Poors Transparency & Disclosure Rankings
C.S. Agnes Cheng Louisiana State University Denton Collins Texas Tech University - Area of Accounting Henry Huang Prairie View A&M University - College of Business January 2006 Abstract: This paper investigates whether the Standard & Poors (S&P) transparency and disclosure (T&D)rankings informed the financial markets with respect to firms' corporate governance and disclosure practices when the results of the study were released by S&P on October 15, 2002. The S&P T&D rankings report the relative levels of three disclosure dimensions (ownership structure and investor rights, financial transparency and information disclosure, and board and management structure and process) provided by firms in their annual reports (annual report rankings) and complete regulatory filings (composite rankings). The results suggest that the S&P T&D rankings provided new information to the markets on cross-sectional differences in disclosure, and the market responds unfavorably during the event period to firms with large difference in disclosure levels across annual report and other regulatory filings. Further analyses reveal that the results are driven by the subcategory of ownership structure and investor rights.
Keywords: transparency, disclosures, corporate governance, earning quality, Standard & Poors JEL Classifications: G14, G34, M41, M45 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: April 14, 2003 ; Last revised: February 06, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6a in 0.281 seconds.