Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=369782
 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Legal Positivism


Brian Bix


University of Minnesota Law School


BLACKWELL GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW AND LEGAL THEORY, Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson, eds., Blackwell, 2005

Abstract:     
This article tries to present the jurisprudential school of thought, legal positivism, within a larger context than is usual in contemporary English-language discussions of that approach: (1) showing the intellectual and political contexts in which the movement began; (2) emphasizing the variety of theories that fit under that label (e.g., how the Kelsenian tradition varies significantly from the Hartian tradition); and (3) discussing how the future development of legal positivism will depend on its discussion of wider theoretical issues (e.g., the proper approach to social theory, and the use of conceptual analysis in philosophy). The article also summarizes the main criticisms of legal positivism, and gives an overview of the internal debate of inclusive legal positivism versus exclusive legal positivism.

Note: This is a description of the paper and not the actual abstract.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 24, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Bix, Brian, Legal Positivism. BLACKWELL GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW AND LEGAL THEORY, Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson, eds., Blackwell, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=369782 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.369782

Contact Information

Brian Bix (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2505 (Phone)
612-625-2011 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,724
Downloads: 2,355
Download Rank: 2,724
Citations:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds